NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Technical Findings, Lessons Learned, and Recommendations Resulting from the Helios Prototype Vehicle MishapThe Helios Prototype was originally planned to be two separate vehicles, but because of resource limitations only one vehicle was developed to demonstrate two missions. The vehicle consisted of two configurations, one for each mission. One configuration, designated HP01, was designed to operate at extremely high altitudes using batteries and high-efficiency solar cells spread across the upper surface of its 247-foot wingspan. On August 13, 2001, the HP01 configuration reached an altitude of 96,863 feet, a world record for sustained horizontal flight by a winged aircraft. The other configuration, designated HP03, was designed for long-duration flight. The plan was to use the solar cells to power the vehicle's electric motors and subsystems during the day and to use a modified commercial hydrogen-air fuel cell system for use during the night. The aircraft design used wing dihedral, engine power, elevator control surfaces, and a stability augmentation and control system to provide aerodynamic stability and control. At about 30 minutes into the second flight of HP03, the aircraft encountered a disturbance in the way of turbulence and morphed into an unexpected, persistent, high dihedral configuration. As a result of the persistent high dihedral, the aircraft became unstable in a very divergent pitch mode in which the airspeed excursions from the nominal flight speed about doubled every cycle of the oscillation. The aircraft s design airspeed was subsequently exceeded and the resulting high dynamic pressures caused the wing leading edge secondary structure on the outer wing panels to fail and the solar cells and skin on the upper surface of the wing to rip away. As a result, the vehicle lost its ability to maintain lift, fell into the Pacific Ocean within the confines of the U.S. Navy's Pacific Missile Range Facility, and was destroyed. This paper describes the mishap and its causes, and presents the technical recommendations and lessons learned for improving the design, analysis, and testing methods and techniques required for this class of vehicle.
Document ID
20070022260
Acquisition Source
Langley Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Noll, Thomas E.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Ishmael, Stephen D.
(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)
Henwood, Bart
(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)
Perez-Davis, Marla E.
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Tiffany, Geary C.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Madura, John
(NASA Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)
Gaier, Matthew
(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)
Brown, John M.
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder, CO, United States)
Wierzbanowski, Ted
(AeroVironment, Inc. Monrovia, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
August 23, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2007
Subject Category
Aircraft Design, Testing And Performance
Meeting Information
Meeting: NATO/RTO AVT-145 Workshop on Design Concepts, Processes and Criteria for UAV Structural Integrity
Location: Florence
Country: Italy
Start Date: May 14, 2007
End Date: May 18, 2007
Funding Number(s)
WBS: WBS 810031.07.12
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available