On the origin of the magnetic field in type-1 comet tails - A reply to Ershkovich

Ershkovich (1976) employed the observed geometry of the type 1 tail of comet Arend-Roland 1957 III to show that any magnetic field present there cannot be of 'internal' origin but must have been 'captured' from the magnetized solar wind. Such an 'external' origin for the magnetic field in type 1 comet tails is not disputed, but several other points raised by Ershkovich are discussed. These concern the generation of substantial magnetic fields within the coma during periods when the comet's heliocentric distance is typically not greater than 1 AU, Ershkovich's use of the pressure balance across the tail 'tangential discontinuity' to estimate that the 'captured' magnetic field is of the order of the solar wind-field, his interpretation of certain observations of motions in the tail of comet Arend-Roland, and his assertion that the distant comet tail will be transformed into a turbulent wake due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. It is argued that the 'captured' magnetic field should be substantially amplified relative to the solar-wind field, that the pressure-balance equation is of limited use, and that the real configuration of a type 1 tail must be treated in detail before any definite conclusions can be reached about the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability.