NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Comparison of uniform perturbation and numerical solutions for some potential flows past slender bodiesApproximate solutions for potential flow past an axisymmetric slender body and past a thin airfoil are calculated using a uniform perturbation method and then compared with either the exact analytical solution or the solution obtained using a purely numerical method. The perturbation method is based upon a representation of the disturbance flow as the superposition of singularities distributed entirely within the body, while the numerical (panel) method is based upon a distribution of singularities on the surface of the body. It is found that the perturbation method provides very good results for small values of the slenderness ratio and for small angles of attack. Moreover, for comparable accuracy, the perturbation method is simpler to implement, requires less computer memory, and generally uses less computation time than the panel method. In particular, the uniform perturbation method yields good resolution near the regions of the leading and trailing edges where other methods fail or require special attention.
Document ID
19860025530
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Wong, T.-C.
(George Washington University Washington, DC, United States)
Liu, C. H.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Geer, J.
(New York, State University Binghamton, United States)
Date Acquired
August 12, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 1985
Publication Information
Publication: Computers and Fluids
Volume: 13
Issue: 3 19
ISSN: 0045-7930
Subject Category
Aerodynamics
Accession Number
86A10268
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-14605
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17070
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available