A self-consistent interpretation of the solar flare extreme-ultraviolet to hard X-ray ratio in large events

This paper shows quantitatively that when a limiting X-ray yield is considered, a universal area of 10 to the 17th sq cm used in the thick-target electron bombardment model of McClymont and Canfield (1986) cannot explain the observed hard X-ray flux in large solar flare events without recourse to extreme values of the physical parameters of the flaring corona. The return current ohmic heating produced by a beam of flux 10 to the 13th ergs/sq cm/s results in a coronal temperature in excess of 100 million K. In this case, the thermal hard X-ray emission dominates the nonthermal emission and the EUV-to-hard X-ray ratio would not decrease with increasing hard X-ray flux, as observed. Hence, any model that requires a beam flux of 10 to the 13th ergs/sq cm/s is untenable. It is proposed that these apparently contradictory results can be reconciled if the X-ray emitting area is substantially larger than the area of the chromospheric precipitation site.