Comparisons of thermochemical nonequilibrium viscous flowfield predictions for AFE vehicle

Numerical solutions for the Aeroassist Flight Experiment vehicle were obtained from three methods at a trajectory point corresponding to the maximum aerodynamic heating. The flow regime and vehicle's speed require a viscous model of laminar flow and finite-rate chemical and thermal modeling. The computational domain covers both forebody and base such that the shock layer and near wake flowfield are included. Because of differences in computational grids, methods of solution, and models of rate equations, the results are generally in poor agreement. Temperature and species concentrations are strongly affected by the physical model equations and associated parameters. The chemistry model based on 11 species is found to yield lower translational temperature profile near stagnation than those from a seven-species model. The vibrational temperature varies according to the modeling details. All solutions indicate that strong neutral and/or molecular dissociation and weak ionization take place at the forebody and vibrational freezing is present in the afterbody expansion region where the vibrational temperature is higher than the translational temperature. Some forms of shear layer emanating from the aerobrake skirt coalesce in the region of reversed flow behind the vehicle.