NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Central difference TVD and TVB schemes for time dependent and steady state problemsWe use central differences to solve the time dependent Euler equations. The schemes are all advanced using a Runge-Kutta formula in time. Near shocks, a second difference is added as an artificial viscosity. This reduces the scheme to a first order upwind scheme at shocks. The switch that is used guarantees that the scheme is locally total variation diminishing (TVD). For steady state problems it is usually advantageous to relax this condition. Then small oscillations do not activate the switches and the convergence to a steady state is improved. To sharpen the shocks, different coefficients are needed for different equations and so a matrix valued dissipation is introduced and compared with the scalar viscosity. The connection between this artificial viscosity and flux limiters is shown. Any flux limiter can be used as the basis of a shock detector for an artificial viscosity. We compare the use of the van Leer, van Albada, mimmod, superbee, and the 'average' flux limiters for this central difference scheme. For time dependent problems, we need to use a small enough time step so that the CFL was less than one even though the scheme was linearly stable for larger time steps. Using a total variation bounded (TVB) Runge-Kutta scheme yields minor improvements in the accuracy.
Document ID
19920039544
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Jorgenson, P.
(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Turkel, E.
(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH; Tel Aviv University, Israel)
Date Acquired
August 15, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 1992
Subject Category
Fluid Mechanics And Heat Transfer
Report/Patent Number
AIAA PAPER 92-0053
Accession Number
92A22168
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available