NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Estimating the urban bias of surface shelter temperatures using upper-air and satellite data. Part 1: Development of models predicting surface shelter temperaturesMultiple regression techniques were used to predict surface shelter temperatures based on the time period 1986-89 using upper-air data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) to represent the background climate and site-specific data to represent the local landscape. Global monthly mean temperature models were developed using data from over 5000 stations available in the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). Monthly maximum, mean, and minimum temperature models for the United States were also developed using data from over 1000 stations available in the U.S. Cooperative (COOP) Network and comparative monthly mean temperature models were developed using over 1150 U.S. stations in the GHCN. Three-, six-, and full-variable models were developed for comparative purposes. Inferences about the variables selected for the various models were easier for the GHCN models, which displayed month-to-month consistency in which variables were selected, than for the COOP models, which were assigned a different list of variables for nearly every month. These and other results suggest that global calibration is preferred because data from the global spectrum of physical processes that control surface temperatures are incorporated in a global model. All of the models that were developed in this study validated relatively well, especially the global models. Recalibration of the models with validation data resulted in only slightly poorer regression statistics, indicating that the calibration list of variables was valid. Predictions using data from the validation dataset in the calibrated equation were better for the GHCN models, and the globally calibrated GHCN models generally provided better U.S. predictions than the U.S.-calibrated COOP models. Overall, the GHCN and COOP models explained approximately 64%-95% of the total variance of surface shelter temperatures, depending on the month and the number of model variables. In addition, root-mean-square errors (rmse's) were over 3 C for GHCN models and over 2 C for COOP models for winter months, and near 2 C for GHCN models and near 1.5 C for COOP models for summer months.
Document ID
19950047978
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Epperson, David L.
(North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, United States)
Davis, Jerry M.
(North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, United States)
Bloomfield, Peter
(North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, United States)
Karl, Thomas R.
(NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, United States)
Mcnab, Alan L.
(NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, United States)
Gallo, Kevin P.
(NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, United States)
Date Acquired
August 16, 2013
Publication Date
February 1, 1995
Publication Information
Publication: Journal of Applied Meteorology
Volume: 34
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0894-8763
Subject Category
Meteorology And Climatology
Accession Number
95A79577
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available