NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
On the Relative Importance of Convection and Temperature on the Behavior of the Ionosphere in North American during January 6-12, 1997Measurements from a network of digisondes and an incoherent scatter radar In Eastern North American For January 6-12, 1997 have been compared with the Field Line Interhemispheric Plasma (FLIP) model which now includes the effects of electric field convective. With the exception of Bermuda, the model reproduces the daytime electron density very well most of the time. As is typical behavior for winter solar minimum on magnetically undisturbed nights, the measurements at Millstone Hill show high electron temperatures before midnight followed by a rapid decay, which is accompanied by a pronounced density enhancement in the early morning hours. The FLIP model reproduces the nighttime density enhancement well, provided the model is constrained to follow the topside electron temperature and the flux tube is full. Similar density enhancements are seen at Goose Bay, Wallops Island and Bermuda. However, the peak height variation and auroral images indicate the density enhancements at Goose Bay are most likely due to particle precipitation. Contrary to previously published work we find that the nighttime density variation at Millstone Hill is driven by the temperature behavior and not the other way around. Thus, in both the data and model, the overall nighttime density is lowered and the enhancement does not occur if the temperature remains high all night. Our calculations show that convections of plasma from higher magnetic latitudes does not cause the observed density maximum but it may enhance the density maximum if over-full flux tubes are convected over the station. On the other had, convection of flux tubes with high temperatures and depleted densities may prevent the density maximum from occurring. Despite the success in modeling the nighttime density enhancements, there remain two unresolved problems. First, the measured density decays much faster than the modeled density near sunset at Millstone Hill and Goose Bay though not at lower latitude stations. Second, we cannot fully explain the large temperatures before midnight nor the sudden decay near midnight.
Document ID
19990064522
Acquisition Source
Marshall Space Flight Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Richards, P. G.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Buonsanto, M. J.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Reinisch, B. W.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Holt, J.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Fennelly, J. A.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Scali, J. L.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Comfort, R. H.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Germany, G. A.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Spann, J.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Brittnacher, M.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Date Acquired
August 19, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 1999
Subject Category
Geophysics
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available