A Comparison of Cilostazol and Pentoxifylline for Treating Intermittent Claudication

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of cilostazol and pentoxifylline. The study included 54 outpatient vascular clinics, including sites at Air Force, Veterans Affairs, tertiary care, and university hospitals in the United States. Of 922 consenting patients, 698 met the inclusion criteria, were randomized, and received treatment with either cilostazol 100 mg P0 twice a day, pentoxifylline 400 mg PO 3 times a day, or placebo. Treatment was double-dummy to ensure study blindness. Efficacy was primarily established by maximal walking distance (MWD), measured with constant-speed, variable-grade treadmill testing, assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks. Mean MWD of cilostazol-treated patients (n=227) was significantly improved at every visit compared with patients who received pentoxifylline (n=232) or placebo (n=239). After 24 weeks of cilostazol, mean MWD increased 53.9% (107.3 m) from baseline, and the effect had not plateaued. This was better (P < 0.001) than the 30.4% (64.4 m) MWD improvement with pentoxifylline. MWD improvement with pentoxifylline was similar (P = 0.82) to that of placebo (64.7 m). Deaths and serious adverse event rates were similar in each group. Common side effects included headache (27.8% with cilostazol, 11.2% with pentoxifylline, 11.7% with placebo), palpitations (17.2% with cilostazol, 2.2% with pentoxifylllne, 1.3% with placebo), and abnormal stools. Cilostazol was significantly better than pentoxifylline or placebo for increasing walking distances; pentoxifylline was no better than placebo.