NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Intensive HST, RXTE, and ASCA Monitoring of NGC 3516: Evidence against Thermal ReprocessingDuring 1998 April 1316, the bright, strongly variable Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 3516 was monitored almost continuously with HST for 10.3 hr at ultraviolet wavelengths and 2.8 days at optical wavelengths, and simultaneous RXTE and ASCA monitoring covered the same period. The X-ray fluxes were strongly variable with the soft (0.5-2 keV) X-rays showing stronger variations (approx. 65% peak to peak) than the hard (2-10 keV) X-rays (approx. 50% peak to peak). The optical continuum showed much smaller but still highly significant variations: a slow approx. 2.5% rise followed by a faster approx. 3.5% decline. The short ultraviolet observation did not show significant variability. The soft and hard X-ray light curves were strongly correlated, with no evidence for a significant interband lag. Likewise, the optical continuum bands (3590 and 5510 A) were also strongly correlated, with no measurable lag, to 3(sigma) limits of approx. less than 0.15 day. However, the optical and X-ray light curves showed very different behavior, and no significant correlation or simple relationship could be found. These results appear difficult to reconcile with previous reports of correlations between X-ray and optical variations and of measurable lags within the optical band for some other Seyfert 1 galaxies. These results also present serious problems for "reprocessing" models in which the X-ray source heats a stratified accretion disk, which then reemits in the optical/ultraviolet : the synchronous variations within the optical would suggest that the emitting region is approx. less than 0.3 It-day across, while the lack of correlation between X-ray and optical variations would indicate, in the context of this model, that any reprocessing region must be approx. greater than 1 It-day in size. It may be possible to resolve this conflict by invoking anisotropic emission or special geometry, but the most natural explanation appears to be that the bulk of the optical luminosity is generated by some mechanism other than reprocessing.
Document ID
20040052876
Acquisition Source
Headquarters
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
External Source(s)
Authors
Edelson, Rick
(California Univ. Los Angeles, CA, United States)
Koratkar, Anuradha
(Space Telescope Science Inst. Baltimore, MD, United States)
Nandra, Kirpal
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Goad, Michael
(Leicester Univ. United Kingdom)
Peterson, Bradley M.
(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)
Collier, Stefan
(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)
Krolik, Julian
(Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore, MD, United States)
Malkan, Matthew
(California Univ. Los Angeles, CA, United States)
Maoz, Dan
(Tel-Aviv Univ., Ramat-Aviv Tel-Aviv, Israel)
OBrien, Paul
(Leicester Univ. United Kingdom)
Date Acquired
August 21, 2013
Publication Date
May 1, 2000
Publication Information
Publication: The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher: American Astronomical Society
Volume: 534
Subject Category
Astrophysics
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: GO-07355
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-7315
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-8397
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available