NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Diagnostic Comparison of Meteorological Analyses during the 2002 Antarctic WinterSeveral meteorological datasets, including U.K. Met Office (MetO), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and NASA's Goddard Earth Observation System (GEOS-4) analyses, are being used in studies of the 2002 Southern Hemisphere (SH) stratospheric winter and Antarctic major warming. Diagnostics are compared to assess how these studies may be affected by the meteorological data used. While the overall structure and evolution of temperatures, winds, and wave diagnostics in the different analyses provide a consistent picture of the large-scale dynamics of the SH 2002 winter, several significant differences may affect detailed studies. The NCEP-NCAR reanalysis (REAN) and NCEP-Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 (REAN-2) datasets are not recommended for detailed studies, especially those related to polar processing, because of lower-stratospheric temperature biases that result in underestimates of polar processing potential, and because their winds and wave diagnostics show increasing differences from other analyses between similar to 30 and 10 hPa (their top level). Southern Hemisphere polar stratospheric temperatures in the ECMWF 40-Yr Re-analysis (ERA-40) show unrealistic vertical structure, so this long-term reanalysis is also unsuited for quantitative studies. The NCEP/Climate Prediction Center (CPC) objective analyses give an inferior representation of the upper-stratospheric vortex. Polar vortex transport barriers are similar in all analyses, but there is large variation in the amount, patterns, and timing of mixing, even among the operational assimilated datasets (ECMWF, MetO, and GEOS-4). The higher-resolution GEOS-4 and ECMWF assimilations provide significantly better representation of filamentation and small-scale structure than the other analyses, even when fields gridded at reduced resolution are studied. The choice of which analysis to use is most critical for detailed transport studies (including polar process modeling) and studies involving synoptic evolution in the upper stratosphere. The operational assimilated datasets are better suited for most applications than the NCEP/CPC objective analyses and the reanalysis datasets.
Document ID
20080022191
Acquisition Source
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Manney, Gloria L.
(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)
Allen, Douglas R.
(Naval Research Lab. Washington, DC, United States)
Kruger, Kirstin
(Freie Univ. Berlin, Germany)
Naujokat, Barbara
(Freie Univ. Berlin, Germany)
Santee, Michelle L.
(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)
Sabutis, Joseph L.
(New Mexico Highlands Univ. Las Vegas, NM, United States)
Pawson, Steven
(Maryland Univ. Baltimore County Baltimore, MD, United States)
Swinbank, Richard
(Meteorological Office Exeter, United Kingdom)
Randall, Cora E.
(Colorado Univ. Boulder, CO, United States)
Simmons, Adrian J.
(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom)
Long, Craig
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Camp Springs, MD, United States)
Date Acquired
August 24, 2013
Publication Date
May 1, 2005
Publication Information
Publication: Monthly Weather Review
Volume: 133
Issue: 5
Subject Category
Meteorology And Climatology
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Other
Keywords
stratosphere
weather forecasting
data assimilation
wind
meteorology
atmospheric waves

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available