NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Small Earth Observing Satellites Flying with Large Satellites in the A-TrainThis paper/poster presents a real-life example of the benefits of flying small satellites with other satellites, large or small, and vice versa. Typically, most small satellites fly payloads consisting of one or two instruments and fly in orbits that are independent from that of other satellites. The science data from these satellites are either used in isolation or correlated with instrument data from other satellites. Data correlation with other satellites is greatly improved when the measurements of the same point or air mass are taken at approximately the same time. Scientists worldwide are beginning to take advantage of the opportunities for improved data correlation, or coincidental science, offered by the international Earth Observing Constellation known as the A-Train (sometimes referred to as the Afternoon Constellation). Most of the A-Train satellites are small - the A-Train is anchored by two large NASA satellites (EOS-Aqua and EOS-Aura), but consists also of 5 small satellites (CloudSat, CALIPSO, PARASOL, OCO and Glory these last two will join in 2009). By flying in a constellation, each mission benefits from coincidental observations from instruments on the other satellites in the constellation. Essentially, from a data point of view, the A-Train can be envisioned as a single, virtual science platform with multiple instruments. Satellites in the A-Train fly at 705 km in sun-synchronous orbits. Their mean local times at the equator are within seconds to a few minutes of each other. This paper describes the challenges of operating an international constellation of independent satellites from the U.S. and Europe to maximize the coincidental science opportunities while at the same time minimizing the level of operational interactions required between team members. The A-Train mission teams have been able to demonstrate that flying as members of an international constellation does not take away the flexibility to accommodate new requirements. Specific examples will be cited, including CloudSat's relocation (to accommodate a new viewing angle for the CALIPSO satellite), Glory's replan to move closer to PARASOL, and OCO's long term plans to minimize on-orbit operations costs while maintaining safety. In all cases, safety is ensured, science returns are enhanced, and operational flexibility is retained to the maximum extent possible.
Document ID
20090017523
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Kelly, Angelita C.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Loverro, Adam
(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)
Case, Warren F.
(SGT, Inc. Greenbelt , MD, United States)
Queruel, Nadege
(Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales Toulouse, France)
Marechal, Chistophe
(Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales Toulouse, France)
Barroso, Therese
(Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales Toulouse, France)
Date Acquired
August 24, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2009
Subject Category
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing
Meeting Information
Meeting: IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation
Location: Berlin
Country: Germany
Start Date: May 4, 2009
End Date: May 8, 2009
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.

Available Downloads

There are no available downloads for this record.
No Preview Available