NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
An analysis of LANDSAT MSS scene-to-scene registration accuracyMeasurements were made for 12 registrations done by ERL for 8 registrations done by SRS. The results indicate that the ERL method is significantly more accurate in five of the eight comparison. The difference between the two methods are not significant in the other three cases. There are two possible reasons for the differences. First, the ERL model is a piecewise linear model and the EDITOR model is a cubic polynomial model. Second, the ERL program resamples using bilinear interpolation while the EDITOR software uses a nearest neighbor resampling. This study did not indicate how much of the difference is attributable to each factor. The average of all merged scene error values for ERL was 31.6 meters and the average for the eight common areas was 32.6 meters. The average of the eight merged scene error values for SRS was 40.1 meters.
Document ID
19820016687
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Seyfarth, B. R.
(NASA National Space Technology Labs. Bay Saint Louis, MS, United States)
Cook, P. W.
(USDA)
Date Acquired
September 4, 2013
Publication Date
December 1, 1981
Subject Category
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing
Report/Patent Number
E82-10285
DC-Y1-04156
NAS 1.15:84694
NASA-TM-84694
NSTL/ERL-198
Report Number: E82-10285
Report Number: DC-Y1-04156
Report Number: NAS 1.15:84694
Report Number: NASA-TM-84694
Report Number: NSTL/ERL-198
Accession Number
82N24563
Funding Number(s)
PROJECT: PROJ. AGRISTARS
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available