NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Collective Intelligence and Three Aspects of Planning in Organizations: A NASA ExampleFor many complex sociotechnical systems, planning seems to require explicit coordination; certainly, in executing a plan the activities of different actors must be tightly coupled. However, distributing the needed planning information can be very burdensome and error prone, because different groups need different collections of information, updated or kept current on different time cycles. Further, the information needed to form successful plans is often highly distributed, and while feedback about the success of prior plans may exist, it may not be available to those in a position of using this to improve plans or to detect and resolve other problems in the system (Weick, 1995). Tools to support various aspects of planning have been developed, and can provide a huge benefit to the individuals working on that aspect. To be tractable, most solutions address a quite bounded slice of work, isolating it from the larger context. Prospective planning takes place over multiple, nested cycles of decision making. This builds a plan that specifies activities of different granularity. "Subplans" may specify multiple parallel activities by different groups and individuals, as well as sequential, nested actions by a single actor. Planning produces valuable, sharable, external, representations: in addition to prospective use, plans support retrospective assessment and also action in the present. Viewing planning in a larger context - both temporal and organizational -- enables noticing what one does not know and generating more systemic and effective solutions. Viewing a problem as one of collective intelligence invites thinking about the larger organizational context. Many approaches to supporting collective intelligence do not support execution of highly contingent actions, distributed across many players, and hence provide incomplete support for planning. However, CI technology maybe helpful in managing the processes of gathering information for decision making in planning and of distributing plan information to various actors, needed on various time cycles.
Document ID
20110008299
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Billman, Dorrit
(San Jose State Univ. San Jose, CA, United States)
Feary, Michael
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
August 25, 2013
Publication Date
February 6, 2010
Subject Category
Behavioral Sciences
Report/Patent Number
ARC-E-DAA-TN1080
Meeting Information
Meeting: The 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010)
Location: Savannah, GA
Country: United States
Start Date: February 6, 2010
End Date: February 10, 2010
Sponsors: Association for Computing Machinery
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available