Comparison of the Effectiveness of Flares With That of Fins for Stabilizing Low Fineness Ratio Bodies at Mach Numbers From 0.6 to 5.8

An experimental and analytical investigation has been made of the effectiveness of flares and of fins for providing aerodynamic stability of low-fineness-ratio bodies near zero angle of attack. Wind-tunnel tests were performed at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 3.8 to measure the normal force, center of pressure, and drag of bodies consisting of conical noses in combination with cylindrical midsections and finned or flared aftersections. This study included an investigation of the effects of nose bluntness, midbody length, flare angle (from 0° to 20°), and fin leading-edge bluntness.

The results showed that for the same plan-form area, flares were more effective than fins, but for the same drag, fins were more effective than flares. Flow separation, which occurred ahead of a flare at certain Mach numbers, resulted in an increase in the stabilizing effectiveness of the flare and a decrease in the drag. However, flow separation led to large undesirable shifts in the center of pressure. Blunt fins were found to be more effective than sharp fins, with the vertical as well as the horizontal fins contributing to the effectiveness.

Comparisons of the analytical with the experimental results indicated that the analytical method employed gave good estimates of the stabilizing effectiveness of both fins and flares throughout the supersonic Mach number range.