Analysis of flight test transition and turbulent heating data. Part 2: Turbulent heating results

The results of three turbulent heating predictions (Van Driest II, Spalding-Chi, and Walker Eckert reference enthalpy) have been compared to the data of several re-entry vehicles. Details and comparisons of each technique with the data are presented. The data analyzed cover a range of local Mach numbers of 3.3 to 15.2, wall to boundary layer edge temperature ratio of 0.46 to 2.6 and local Reynolds number of 7 times 10 to the 6th power to 5.3 times 10 to the 8th power. Data were transformed to an incompressible plane, using the prediction methods above, and compared with the Colburn and von Karman forms of the Reynolds analogy. The results indicate that the reference enthalpy technique best fits the data when the Colburn analogy was used; whereas, the Van Driest II method agrees with both forms of the Reynolds analogy. The Spalding-Chi method tends to under predict the data. Finally, there does not appear to be any significant difference when comparing the incompressible Stanton number as a function of Renolds number based on either wetted length or momentum thickness.