A model study of landing mat subjected to C-5A loadings

The 1.22 x 1.37 m mat runway in the standard brick pattern with transverse hinged joints is more stable and less susceptible to a buckling failure than the 0.60 x 2.74 m mat runway. Use of tension anchors appears to be a feasible means of controlling longitudinal displacement of the runway and potential runway buckling. Anchors appear to be a practical means to reduce maintenance on mat runways. The 1.22 x 1.37 m mat in the alternate brick pattern or the 90 deg rotated standard brick pattern forms a dynamically more stable runway with a high resistance to buckling failure. The runway in these patterns is much stiffer and longitudinal movement was less than for the standard brick pattern. The model 1.22 x 1.37 m alternate brick pattern runway was difficult to assemble and extremely difficult to take apart.