A comparison of two methods for classifying forestland

Two methods of developing land-cover classifications using Landsat multispectral data were compared. The first method, called P-1, uses a semi-automated approach to develop training statistics which characterize the land-cover types. The second, called multicluster blocks, depends more on analyst interaction to produce the training statistics used by the classifier. The results showed that P-1 performed as well as the multicluster-blocks approach on a mountainous study area in southwestern Colorado. These results may interest any resource discipline which has available to it ground-checked or photointerpreted information. P-1 can use this information directly to output a land-cover classification with little analyst interaction.