NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Conventional engine technology. Volume 3: Comparisons and future potentialThe status of five conventional automobile engine technologies was assessed and the future potential for increasing fuel economy and reducing exhaust emission was discussed, using the 1980 EPA California emisions standards as a comparative basis. By 1986, the fuel economy of a uniform charge Otto engine with a three-way catalyst is expected to increase 10%, while vehicles with lean burn (fast burn) engines should show a 20% fuel economy increase. Although vehicles with stratified-charge engines and rotary engines are expected to improve, their fuel economy will remain inferior to the other engine types. When adequate NO emissions control methods are implemented to meet the EPA requirements, vehicles with prechamber diesel engines are expected to yield a fuel economy advantage of about 15%. While successful introduction of direct injection diesel engine technology will provide a fuel savings of 30 to 35%, the planned regulation of exhaust particulates could seriously hinder this technology, because it is expected that only the smallest diesel engine vehicles could meet the proposed particulate requirements.
Document ID
19820011670
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Contractor Report (CR)
Authors
Dowdy, M. W.
(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
September 4, 2013
Publication Date
December 15, 1981
Subject Category
Mechanical Engineering
Report/Patent Number
NASA-CR-168645
DOE/CS-50194/1
JPL-PUB-81-VOL-3
Report Number: NASA-CR-168645
Report Number: DOE/CS-50194/1
Report Number: JPL-PUB-81-VOL-3
Accession Number
82N19544
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI01-80CS-50194
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-100
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available