Full versus limited versus no steerability

The range of phenomena of the MST radar technique to divide the steerability versus nonsteerability problem into two broad with a third subset that lies between these two limits are studied. Processes that vary on a horizontal scale which are comparable to the area of the probing radar beam can best be fully steerable beams. The use of fixed beam systems would be a long term study of the mean wind field. Orographic effects due to mountain ridges and/or land-sea interfaces demand steerable beams, particularly if the effects are three dimensional in character. In view of their lack of moving parts fixed beam systems are more reliable. It is assumed that the reliability of a system is inversely proportioned to the number of moving parts. This is not a problem for fixed beam systems.