Comparison of measurements by different instruments of the far-infrared reflectance of rough, optically black coatings

Two comparisons of available specular infrared measurements using identical or very similar coatings reveal that specular BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) measurements of rough coatings are comparable but that simple measured reflectances are not. This is seen as indicating that the diffuse component of the measured specular reflectance is significantly larger than that of the specular component. It is noted that the diffuse component of the measurement is a convolution of the intrinsic directional reflectivity of the surface with the instrument function and that because the value of that function increases at the wavelengths under consideration, the diffuse component is larger than would otherwise be expected. The BRDF normalization is found to cause a primitive deconvolution of the instrument function and to produce a quantity that is approximately equal to the mean intrinsic directional reflectivity very near the specular direction. The analysis and comparison of data reveal that nonspecular BRDF measurements at angles well outside the instrument function can be calibrated as well by an image of the source upon the detector as by reference to a known surface.