Comparison of noise prediction for the X-wing system and a conventional rotor in hover

Analytic predictions of X-wing rotor noise levels in hover without circulation control are presented and compared with measured data at two observer locations. Agreement of predictions and data is best in the rotor plane, due to the dominance of thickness noise terms. Predictions are made for the X-wing and a conventional type rotor system and are compared at two locations at the same tip speed and at each rotor's design tip speed. The acoustic signal of the X-wing is more heavily influenced by thickness noise terms than the conventional rotor. The comparison of each rotor's noise levels depends on the observer location and the amount of circulation control blowing employed.