NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
A comparison between IMSC, PI and MIMSC methods in controlling the vibration of flexible systemsA comparative study is presented between three active control algorithms which have proven to be successful in controlling the vibrations of large flexible systems. These algorithms are: the Independent Modal Space Control (IMSC), the Pseudo-inverse (PI), and the Modified Independent Modal Space Control (MIMSC). Emphasis is placed on demonstrating the effectiveness of the MIMSC method in controlling the vibration of large systems with small number of actuators by using an efficient time sharing strategy. Such a strategy favors the MIMSC over the IMSC method, which requires a large number of actuators to control equal number of modes, and also over the PI method which attempts to control large number of modes with smaller number of actuators through the use of an in-exact statistical realization of a modal controller. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the main features of the three algorithms and the merits of the MIMSC method.
Document ID
19870016172
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Contractor Report (CR)
Authors
Baz, A.
(Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC, United States)
Poh, S.
(Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC, United States)
Date Acquired
September 5, 2013
Publication Date
August 1, 1987
Subject Category
Structural Mechanics
Report/Patent Number
NAS 1.26:181156
NASA-CR-181156
Report Number: NAS 1.26:181156
Report Number: NASA-CR-181156
Accession Number
87N25605
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-520
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-749
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available