Conforming versus non-conforming boundary elements in three-dimensional elastostatics

A critical comparison of two basic formulations in three-dimensional elastostatics, using conforming and nonconforming boundary elements, is presented. The basic structure of the boundary element method is developed. The peculiarities that both types of boundary elements present in relation to the numerical implementation are discussed. Through selected examples, key issues such as the computational advantages and disadvantages of both formulations, mesh discretization and accuracy questions, and optimal location of the collocation nodes in the case of nonconforming elements are addressed. It is shown that conforming elements are able to produce more accurate results than nonconforming ones, with substantial economy in the final size of the system equations.