NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
High altitude atmospheric modelingFive empirical models were compared with 13 data sets, including both atmospheric drag-based data and mass spectrometer data. The most recently published model, MSIS-86, was found to be the best model overall with an accuracy around 15 percent. The excellent overall agreement of the mass spectrometer-based MSIS models with the drag data, including both the older data from orbital decay and the newer accelerometer data, suggests that the absolute calibration of the (ensemble of) mass spectrometers and the assumed drag coefficient in the atomic oxygen regime are consistent to 5 percent. This study illustrates a number of reasons for the current accuracy limit such as calibration accuracy and unmodeled trends. Nevertheless, the largest variations in total density in the thermosphere are accounted for, to a very high degree, by existing models. The greatest potential for improvements is in areas where we still have insufficient data (like the lower thermosphere or exosphere), where there are disagreements in technique (such as the exosphere) which can be resolved, or wherever generally more accurate measurements become available.
Document ID
19890002769
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Hedin, Alan E.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Date Acquired
September 5, 2013
Publication Date
October 1, 1988
Subject Category
Geophysics
Report/Patent Number
NAS 1.15:100707
NASA-TM-100707
REPT-88B-0260
Report Number: NAS 1.15:100707
Report Number: NASA-TM-100707
Report Number: REPT-88B-0260
Accession Number
89N12140
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: MIPR-FY-616870485
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available