NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Structural development of laminar flow control aircraft chordwise wing joint designsFor laminar flow to be achieved, any protuberances on the surface must be small enough to avoid transition to turbulent flow. However, the surface must have joints between the structural components to allow assembly or replacement of damaged parts, although large continuous surfaces can be utilized to minimize the number the number of joints. Aircraft structural joints usually have many countersunk bolts or rivets on the outer surface. To maintain no mismatch on outer surfaces, it is desirable to attach the components from the inner surface. It is also desirable for the panels to be interchangeable, without the need for shims at the joint, to avoid surface discontinuities that could cause turbulence. Fabricating components while pressing their outer surfaces against an accurate mold helps to ensure surface smoothness and continuity at joints. These items were considered in evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the joint design concepts. After evaluating six design concepts, two of the leading candidates were fabricated and tested using many small test panels. One joint concept was also built and tested using large panels. The small and large test panel deflections for the leading candidate designs at load factors up to +1.5 g's were well within the step and waviness requirements for avoiding transition.The small panels were designed and tested for compression and tension at -65 F, at ambient conditions, and at 160 F. The small panel results for the three-rib and the sliding-joint concepts indicated that they were both acceptable. The three-rib concept, with tapered splice plates, was considered to be the most practical. A modified three-rib joint that combined the best attributes of previous candidates was designed, developed, and tested. This improved joint met all of the structural strength, surface smoothness, and waviness criteria for laminar flow control (LFC). The design eliminated all disadvantages of the initial three-rib concept except for unavoidable eccentricity, which was reduced and reacted satisfactorily by the rib supports. It should also result in a relatively simple low-cost installation, and makes it easy to replace any panels damaged in the field.
Document ID
19910005033
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Contractor Report (CR)
Authors
Fischler, J. E.
(Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. Long Beach, CA, United States)
Jerstad, N. M.
(Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. Long Beach, CA, United States)
Gallimore, F. H., Jr.
(Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. Long Beach, CA, United States)
Pollard, T. J.
(Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. Long Beach, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
September 6, 2013
Publication Date
April 1, 1989
Subject Category
Aircraft Design, Testing And Performance
Report/Patent Number
NASA-CR-181888
NAS 1.26:181888
Report Number: NASA-CR-181888
Report Number: NAS 1.26:181888
Accession Number
91N14346
Funding Number(s)
PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-41-01
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18037
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available