Simultaneous imaging of optical CN lines and radio HCN lines in comet Austin

The parent molecule of cometary CN has been the subject of speculation for a long time. When HCN was detected at 3.4 mm in Comet Kohoutek, the problem seemed to be resolved, but much more detailed work on Comet Halley raised the quantitative question of whether HCN could be the only parent. Therefore, comparative CN/HCN studies are vital for understanding the origin of cometary CN. The striking observation of CN jets in Comet Halley raised another very interesting question about the origin of CN. Traditional theory permits only dust features to remain well defined far from the nucleus. The CN jets were interpreted as arising from submicron sized dust particles, perhaps CHON particles. An estimated 10 to 50 percent of the CN in the comet was in the jets in the Halley observations. Several hypotheses can be made: (1) some of the CN originates from the dust and has nothing to do with HCN; or, (2) at least some of the HCN is also produced from the dust in the coma rather than directly from the nucleus. (In the second hypothesis, whether CHN is or is not the parent of the CN associated with the dust would need to be established.) The extended scalelengths found for CO by Eberhardt et. al. (1987) and for H2CO by Snyder et. al. (1989) also support ideas like hypothesis (2). A third hypothesis should be mentioned; contrary to the usual theory, the gas flow does not become isotropic (Combi 1987). For all of the reasons mentioned, it is essential to make a detailed comparison of the spatial distributions of CN and HCN. Furthermore, because of the variability of cometary emissions, it is necessary to make measurements simultaneously.