Sources of error in thematic classification of remotely sensed imagery

From a statistician's point of view, the input datasets are rarely examined to determine their underlying frequency distribution; it is just assumed that the data are normal enough, and that the deviations from normality are unimportant. It is not clear how deviations from a hypothetical multivariate normal might affect the power of the classification process, and there is ample evidence in the literature that, at a minimum, the spectral channels are correlated. From a practioner's point of view, in a supervised classification the number of training fields for developing a statistical description of a given class is usually arbitrary. It is unclear how small changes in the details of the training field selection process affect the quality of the derived thematic information. The start of an examination of this latter problem is discussed.