Application of engineering codes to the assessment of spacecraft charging induced hazards

One of the major hurdles to developing a better understanding of the environmentally induced interactions in spacecraft systems (spacecraft charging) is the lack of simple tools to analyze the behavior of the spacecraft in a sub-storm environment. The available tool, NASA Charging Analyzer Program (NASCAP), is expensive to use and treats only half of the problem - surface effects only. In response to this need, we have developed, under our IRAD Program, a set of engineering tools that operate on personal computers and addresses both the surface and bulk charging aspects of the interactions. These engineering codes utilize circuit analysis techniques and model simplifications to allow rapid computations. The codes were compared to both NASCAP predictions and to bulk charging data with excellent agreement for both phenomena. The models used in our engineering codes are shown, and in the engineering codes, the models are defined in terms of plates or triangles in an unconfined space. The predictions are based upon current balances to each plate. The code has routines to allow interactions between the plates to simulate 'barrier' effects. The agreement for the predicted differential surface voltages for the model is given. In conducting the comparison of engineering codes to NASCAP predictions, it was found that some inconsistencies existed in the NASCAP code that are not obvious to the user. The use of the grid imposes constraints that voltage gradients exist between the grid points. This allows the existence of voltage gradients in conductors and influences surface resistivity predictions. These points are discussed along with the predictions for treating these inconsistencies properly. The model predictions for a variable intensity substorm is also presented.