Satellite estimates of downwelling longwave irradiance at the surface during FIFE

Two methods of estimating the downward longwave flux at the earth's surface from satellite measurements are evaluated by comparing estimate calculations to in situ measurements. Attention is given to the low degree of accuracy inherent in longwave irradiance measurements and the subsequent difficulty in validating radiative transfer models. The fluxes are determined by using the models by Morcrette et al. (1986) and by Gupta (1989), and the models are found to be highly correlated for the same atmospheric profiles although an inherent bias is noted. The differences between the model computations and in situ measurements are found to be of the same order of magnitude as the differences among the measurements themselves. The difficulty of quantifying the accuracy of radiative transfer models is related to the paucity of reliable surface measurements.