Chemical differentiation of a convecting planetary interior: Consequences for a one-plate planet such as Venus

Chemically depleted mantle forming a buoyant, refractory layer at the top of the mantle can have important implications for the evolution of the interior and surface. On Venus, the large apparent depths of compensation for surface topographic features might be explained if surface topography were supported by variations in the thickness of a 100-200 km thick chemically buoyant mantle layer or by partial melting in the mantle at the base of such a layer. Long volcanic flows seen on the surface may be explained by deep melting that generates low-viscosity MgO-rich magmas. The presence of a shallow refractory mantle layer may also explain the lack of volcanism associated with rifting. As the depleted layer thickens and cools, it becomes denser than the convecting interior and the portion of it that is hot enough to flow can mix with the convecting mantle. Time dependence of the thickness of a depleted layer may create episodic resurfacing events as needed to explain the observed distribution of impact craters on the venusian surface. We consider a planetary structure consisting of a crust, depleted mantle layer, and a thermally and chemically well-mixed convecting mantle. The thermal evolution of the convecting spherical planetary interior is calculated using energy conservation: the time rate of change of thermal energy in the interior is equated to the difference in the rate of radioactive heat production and the rate of heat transfer across the thermal boundary layer. Heat transfer across the thermal boundary layer is parameterized using a standard Nusselt number-Rayleigh number relationship. The radioactive heat production decreases with time corresponding to decay times for the U, Th, and K. The planetary interior cools by the advection of hot mantle at temperature T interior into the thermal boundary layer where it cools conductively. The crust and depleted mantle layers do not convect in our model so that a linear conductive equilibrium temperature distribution is assumed. The rate of melt production is calculated as the product of the volume flux of mantle into the thermal boundary layer and the degree of melting that this mantle undergoes. The volume flux of mantle into the thermal boundary layer is simply the heat flux divided by amount of heat lost in cooling mantle to the average temperature in the thermal boundary layer. The degree of melting is calculated as the temperature difference above the solidus, divided by the latent heat of melting. A maximum degree of melting is prescribed corresponding to the maximum amount of basaltic melt that the mantle can initially generate. As the crust thickens, the pressure at the base of the crust becomes high enough and the temperature remains low enough for basalt to transform to dense eclogite.