Using neural networks to assist in OPAD data analysis

The space shuttle main engine (SSME) became the subject of plume emission spectroscopy in 1986 when researchers from NASA-Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC), and Rocketdyne went to the SSME test stands at the NASA-Stennis Space Center and at Rocketdyne's Santa Susan Field Laboratory to optically observe the plume. Since then, plume spectral acquisitions have recorded many nominal tests and the qualitative spectral features of the SSME plume are now well established. Significant discoveries made with both wide-band and narrow-band plume emission spectroscopy systems led MSFC to promote the Optical Plume Anomaly Detection (OPAD) program with a goal of instrumenting all SSME test stands with customized spectrometer systems. A prototype OPAD system is now installed on the SSME Technology Test Bed (TTB) at MSFC. The OPAD system instrumentation consists of a broad-band, optical multiple-channel analyzer (OMA) and a narrow-band device called a polychrometer. The OMA is a high-resolution (1.5-2.0 Angstroms) 'super-spectrometer' covering the near-ultraviolet to near-infrared waveband (2800-7400 Angstroms), providing two scans per second. The polychrometer consists of sixteen narrow-band radiometers: fourteen monitoring discrete wavelengths of health and condition monitoring elements and two dedicated to monitoring background emissions. All sixteen channels are capable of providing 500 samples per second. To date, the prototype OPAD system has been used during 43 SSME firings on the TTB, collecting well over 250 megabytes of plume spectral data. One goal of OPAD data analysis is to determine interatively with the help of a computer code, SPECTRA4, developed at AEDC. Experience has shown that iteration with SPECTRA4 is an incredibly labor intensive task and not one to be performed by band. What is really needed is the 'inverse' of SPECTRA4 but the mathematical model for this inverse mapping is tenuous at best. However, the robustness of PSECTRA4 run in the 'forward' direction means that accurate input/output mappings can be obtained. If the mappings were inverted (i.e., input becomes output and output becomes input) then an 'inverse' of SPECTRA4 would be at hand but the 'model' would be specific to the data utilized and would in no way be general. Building a generalized model based upon known input/output mappings while ignoring the details of the governing physical model is possible through the use of a neural network. The research investigation described involves the development of a neural network to provide a generalized 'inverse' of SPECTRA4. The objectives of the research were to design an appropriate neural network architecture, train the network, and then evaluate its performance.