NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
The value of the 4-day headdown bedrest model for screening countermeasuresIn order to evaluate the benefits of periodic exposure to the +G(z) vector as a countermeasure to the physiological responses to minus 6 degree head down bedrest (HDT), we considered a two-tiered approach: (a) to use 4 days HDT as a quick and inexpensive means of screening countermeasures, (b) to use a 60 day HDT to validate the most promising candidates. The approach and results of a 4 day study are described here. Methods: Nine males were admitted to our Human Research Facility for one ambulatory control day followed by 4 days HDT and were released on the next day after completion of a peak oxygen consumption test (VO(sub 2 peak)). A battery of tests was selected and standardized to evaluate the known early effects of HDT on plasma volume, early bone markers, orthostatic tolerance, physical performance, and fluid and electrolytes and their hormone regulation. Fluid sodium (Na) and potassium (K) intake and output in the urine were monitored throughout. Plasma volume was determined with a modified Evans Blue method and orthostatic tolerance with a 60 degree head-up tilt test for 30 minutes - both of which were determined on the ambulatory control day and on day 4 of HDT. Immediately after completion of the tilt test subjects were returned to the minus 6 degree position until the next morning when a VO(sub 2 peak) (horizontal ergometer) was done. This was compared to a similar control test determined on 2 separate occasions before subject admission. Results: Four hours after going HDT produced significant decreases (p less than 0.05) in the circulating concentration of fluid and electrolyte regulating hormones. Plasma volume, orthostatic tolerance and VO(sub 2 peak) changed significantly after 4 days HDT. There was also the expected natriuresis on day 1 of HDT but no significant diuresis. The consistency of the pre-bedrest VO(sub 2 peak) tilt tests and plasma volumes was remarkable. Conclusions: The 4 day HDT model seems highly promising for screening a variety of countermeasures alone and in combination before validating their benefits in extended bedrest or flight experiments.
Document ID
19950010367
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Vernikos, J.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Keil, L.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Ertl, A. C.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Wade, C. E.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Greenleaf, J. E.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Ohara, D.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Ludwig, D.
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
September 6, 2013
Publication Date
May 14, 1992
Publication Information
Publication: Aerospace Medical Association, Aerospace Medical Association 63rd Annual Scientific Meeting Program
Subject Category
Aerospace Medicine
Accession Number
95N16782
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available