NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Optimizing the Zeldovich approximationWe have recently learned that the Zeldovich approximation can be successfully used for a far wider range of gravitational instability scenarios than formerly proposed; we study here how to extend this range. In previous work (Coles, Melott and Shandarin 1993, hereafter CMS) we studied the accuracy of several analytic approximations to gravitational clustering in the mildly nonlinear regime. We found that what we called the 'truncated Zeldovich approximation' (TZA) was better than any other (except in one case the ordinary Zeldovich approximation) over a wide range from linear to mildly nonlinear (sigma approximately 3) regimes. TZA was specified by setting Fourier amplitudes equal to zero for all wavenumbers greater than k(sub nl), where k(sub nl) marks the transition to the nonlinear regime. Here, we study the cross correlation of generalized TZA with a group of n-body simulations for three shapes of window function: sharp k-truncation (as in CMS), a tophat in coordinate space, or a Gaussian. We also study the variation in the crosscorrelation as a function of initial truncation scale within each type. We find that k-truncation, which was so much better than other things tried in CMS, is the worst of these three window shapes. We find that a Gaussian window e(exp(-k(exp 2)/2k(exp 2, sub G))) applied to the initial Fourier amplitudes is the best choice. It produces a greatly improved crosscorrelation in those cases which most needed improvement, e.g. those with more small-scale power in the initial conditions. The optimum choice of kG for the Gaussian window is (a somewhat spectrum-dependent) 1 to 1.5 times k(sub nl). Although all three windows produce similar power spectra and density distribution functions after application of the Zeldovich approximation, the agreement of the phases of the Fourier components with the n-body simulation is better for the Gaussian window. We therefore ascribe the success of the best-choice Gaussian window to its superior treatment of phases in the nonlinear regime. We also report on the accuracy of particle positions and velocities produced by TZA.
Document ID
19950012622
Acquisition Source
Legacy CDMS
Document Type
Contractor Report (CR)
Authors
Melott, Adrian L.
(Kansas Univ. Lawrence, KS, United States)
Pellman, Todd F.
(Kansas Univ. Lawrence, KS, United States)
Shandarin, Sergei F.
(Kansas Univ. Lawrence, KS, United States)
Date Acquired
September 6, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 1994
Subject Category
Thermodynamics And Statistical Physics
Report/Patent Number
NASA-CR-197606
NAS 1.26:197606
Report Number: NASA-CR-197606
Report Number: NAS 1.26:197606
Accession Number
95N19037
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-2923
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF OSR-92-55223
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF AST-90-21414
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available