Is PSR 1509-58 the remnant of supernova AD 185?

Thorsett has recently advanced the proposal that the counterpart of the supernova recorded by Chinese astronomers in AD 185 is the pulsar PSR 1509-58 in the supernova remnant MSH 15-52. This proposal is attractive since it was claimed to better fit the visibility contraints that plagued earlier identifications and since the spin-down age of the pulsar is 1690 years. I have examined in detail the question of the visibility of a supernova at the proposed position and find that the reported dates of visibility can be matched only if the supernova appeared substantially brighter than Venus at its peak. For the distance and extinction to the pulsar, this implies M(sub V) (max) was brighter than -21.4 mag, whereas the brightest known absolute magnitude of a Type II supernova is -19.65 (H(sub 0) = 75 km/s/Mpc). Thus, the high required luminosity can be used as good evidence against the identification of SN 185 with PSR 1509-58. However, if the identification is retained, then Hubble's Constant would have to have a small value and/or the supernova had to have been a type IIP event with exceptional brilliance. The earlier identification of SN 185 with MSH 14-63 by Clark and Stephenson can also be reconciled with the visibility data.