Transonic Flutter Characteristics of a 45 deg Sweptback Wing with Various Distributions of Ballast Along the Leading Edge

An investigation of the use of ballast at the leading edge of a sweptback wing as a flutter fix has been made. The investigation was conducted in the Langley transonic blowdown tunnel with wing models which had an aspect ratio of 4, sweepback of the quarter-chord line of 450, and a taper ratio of 0.2. Four ballast configurations, which included different amounts of ballast distributed at two different span-wise locations, were investigated. Full-span sting-mounted models were employed. Data were obtained over a Mach number range from 0.65 to 1.32. Comparison of the data for the ballasted wings with data for a similar wing without ballast shows that in the often critical Mach number range between 0.85 and 1.05, the dynamic pressure required for flutter is increased by as much as 100 percent due to the addition of about 6 percent of the wing mass as ballast at the leading edge of the outboard sections. Furthermore, there are indications that similar benefits of leading-edge ballast can be obtained at Mach numbers above M = 1.1. Changing the spanwise location of the ballast and increasing the amount of the ballast by a factor of about 2 had very little additional effect on the dynamic pressure required for flutter. The possibility, therefore, exists that the beneficial effects obtained may be accomplished by using less than the minimum of about 6 percent of the wing mass as ballast as investigated in this paper.