NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

The auto‑search feature has been disabled based on user feedback. Enter a search term/phrase and click “Search” to begin.

Back to Results
Comparison of Adsorbed Mercury Screening Method With Cold-Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry for Determination of Mercury in SoilA field screening method for the determination of elemental mercury in environmental soil samples involves the thermal desorption of the mercury from the sample onto gold and then the thermal desorption from the gold to a gold-film mercury vapor analyzer. This field screening method contains a large number of conditions that could be optimized for the various types of soils encountered. In this study, the conditions were optimized for the determination of mercury in silty clay materials, and the results were comparable to the cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometric method of determination. This paper discusses the benefits and disadvantages of employing the field screening method and provides the sequence of conditions that must be optimized to employ this method of determination on other soil types.
Document ID
20000034010
Acquisition Source
Glenn Research Center
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Easterling, Donald F.
(Science Applications International Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)
Hovanitz, Edward S.
(Science Applications International Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)
Street, Kenneth W.
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
March 1, 2000
Subject Category
Environment Pollution
Report/Patent Number
NAS 1.15:209642
NASA/TM-2000-209642
E-11973
Report Number: NAS 1.15:209642
Report Number: NASA/TM-2000-209642
Report Number: E-11973
Funding Number(s)
PROJECT: RTOP 910-30-11
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available