NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Engineering Management Capstone Project EM 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US ArmyNASA at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and the U.S. Army at Redstone Arsenal were analyzed to determine whether they were successful in implementing their risk management program. Risk management implementation surveys were distributed to aid in this analysis. The scope is limited to NASA S&MA (Safety and Mission Assurance) at MSFC, including applicable support contractors, and the US Army Engineering Directorate, including applicable contractors, located at Redstone Arsenal. NASA has moderately higher risk management implementation survey scores than the Army. Accordingly, the implementation of the risk management program at NASA is considered good while only two of five of the survey categories indicated that the risk management implementation is good at the Army.
Document ID
20020048548
Acquisition Source
Marshall Space Flight Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Brothers, Mary Ann
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Safie, Fayssal M.
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2002
Subject Category
Administration And Management
Meeting Information
Meeting: International Conference on Industry, Engineering and Management Systems
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Country: United States
Start Date: March 11, 2002
End Date: March 13, 2002
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available