NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Optical Testing of Diamond Machined, Aspheric Mirrors for Groundbased, Near-IR AstronomyThe Infrared Multi-Object Spectrometer (IRMOS) is a facility-class instrument for the Kitt Peak National Observatory 4 and 2.1 meter telescopes. IRMOS is a near-IR (0.8-2.5 micron) spectrometer and operates at approximately 80 K. The 6061-T651 aluminum bench and mirrors constitute an athermal design. The instrument produces simultaneous spectra at low- to mid-resolving power (R=lambda/delta lambda= 300-3000) of approximately 100 objects in its 2.8 x 2.0 arcmin field. We describe ambient and cryogenic optical testing of the IRMOS mirrors across a broad range in spatial frequency (figure error, mid-frequency error, and microroughness). The mirrors include three rotationally symmetric, off-axis conic sections, one off-axis biconic, and several flat fold mirrors. The symmetric mirrors include convex and concave prolate and oblate ellipsoids. They range in aperture from 94x86 mm to 286x269 mm and in f-number from 0.9 to 2.4. The biconic mirror is concave and has a 94x76 mm aperture, R(sub x)=377 mm, k(sub x)=0.0778, R(sub y)=407 mm, and k(sub y)=0.1265 and is decentered by -2 mm in X and 227 mm in Y. All of the mirrors have an aspect ratio of approximately 6:1. The surface error fabrication tolerances are less than 10 nm RMS microroughness, 'best effort' for mid-frequency error, and less than 63.3 nm RMS figure error. Ambient temperature (approximately 293 K) testing is performed for each of the three surface error regimes, and figure testing is also performed at approximately 80 K. Operation of the ADE Phaseshift MicroXAM white light interferometer (micro-roughness) and the Bauer Model 200 profilometer (mid-frequency error) is described. Both the sag and conic values of the aspheric mirrors make these tests challenging. Figure testing is performed using a Zygo GPI interferometer, custom computer generated holograms (CGH), and optomechanical alignment fiducials. Cryogenic CGH null testing is discussed in detail. We discuss complications such as the change in prescription with temperature and thermal gradients. Correction for the effect of the dewar window is also covered. We discuss the error budget for the optical test and alignment procedure. Data reduction is accomplished using commercial optical design and data analysis software packages. Results from CGH testing at cryogenic temperatures are encouraging thus far.
Document ID
20030032194
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Chambers, V. John
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Mink, Ronald G.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Ohl, Raymond G.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Connelly, Joseph A.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Mentzell, J. Eric
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Arnold, Steven M.
(Diffraction International Ltd. Minetonka, MN, United States)
Greenhouse, Matthew A.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)
Winsor, Robert S.
(Space Telescope Science Inst. Baltimore, MD, United States)
MacKenty, John W.
(Space Telescope Science Inst. Baltimore, MD, United States)
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2002
Subject Category
Instrumentation And Photography
Meeting Information
Meeting: SPIE Conference
Location: Kona, HI
Country: United States
Start Date: August 21, 2002
End Date: August 30, 2002
Sponsors: International Society for Optical Engineering
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available