NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

The auto‑search feature has been disabled based on user feedback. Enter a search term/phrase and click “Search” to begin.

Back to Results
Space Station Freedom Central Thermal Control System EvolutionThe objective of the evolution study is to review the proposed growth scenarios for Space Station Freedom and identify the major CTCS hardware scars and software hooks required to facilitate planned growth and technology obsolescence. The Station's two leading evolutionary configurations are: (1) the Research and Development node, where the fundamental mission is scientific research and commercial endeavors, and (2) the Transportation node, where the emphasis is on supporting Lunar and Mars human exploration. These two nodes evolve from the from the assembly complete configuration by the addition of manned modules, pocket labs, resource nodes, attached payloads, customer servicing facility, and an upper and lower keel and boom truss structure. In the case of the R & D node, the role of the dual keel will be to support external payloads for scientific research. In the case of the Transportation node, the keel will support the Lunar (LTV) and Mars (MTV) transportation vehicle service facilities In addition to external payloads. The transverse boom is extended outboard of the alpha gimbal to accommodate the new solar dynamic arrays for power generation, which will supplement the photovoltaic system. The design, development, deployment, and operation of SSF will take place over a 30 year time period and new Innovations and maturation in technologies can be expected. Evolutionary planning must include the obsolescence and insertion of the new technologies over the life of the program, and the technology growth issues must be addressed in parallel with the development of the baseline thermal control system. Technologies that mature and are available within the next 10 years are best suited for evolutionary consideration as the growth phase begins in the year 2000. To increase TCS capability to accommodate growth using baseline technology would require some penalty in mass, volume, EVA time, manifesting, and operational support. To be cost effective the capabilities of the heat acquisition, transport, and rejection subsystems must be increased.
Document ID
20030057821
Acquisition Source
Johnson Space Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Bullock, Richard
(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)
Olsson, Eric
(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Houston, TX, United States)
Date Acquired
August 21, 2013
Publication Date
May 1, 1990
Publication Information
Publication: Beyond the Baseline: Proceedings of the Space Station Freedom Evolution Symposium, Volume 1: Space Station Freedom, Part 2
Subject Category
Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available