NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
The Influence of Mesh Density on the Impact Response of a Shuttle Leading-Edge Panel Finite Element SimulationA study was performed to examine the influence of varying mesh density on an LS-DYNA simulation of a rectangular-shaped foam projectile impacting the space shuttle leading edge Panel 6. The shuttle leading-edge panels are fabricated of reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) material. During the study, nine cases were executed with all possible combinations of coarse, baseline, and fine meshes of the foam and panel. For each simulation, the same material properties and impact conditions were specified and only the mesh density was varied. In the baseline model, the shell elements representing the RCC panel are approximately 0.2-in. on edge, whereas the foam elements are about 0.5-in. on edge. The element nominal edge-length for the baseline panel was halved to create a fine panel (0.1-in. edge length) mesh and doubled to create a coarse panel (0.4-in. edge length) mesh. In addition, the element nominal edge-length of the baseline foam projectile was halved (0.25-in. edge length) to create a fine foam mesh and doubled (1.0- in. edge length) to create a coarse foam mesh. The initial impact velocity of the foam was 775 ft/s. The simulations were executed in LS-DYNA version 960 for 6 ms of simulation time. Contour plots of resultant panel displacement and effective stress in the foam were compared at five discrete time intervals. Also, time-history responses of internal and kinetic energy of the panel, kinetic and hourglass energy of the foam, and resultant contact force were plotted to determine the influence of mesh density. As a final comparison, the model with a fine panel and fine foam mesh was executed with slightly different material properties for the RCC. For this model, the average degraded properties of the RCC were replaced with the maximum degraded properties. Similar comparisons of panel and foam responses were made for the average and maximum degraded models.
Document ID
20040200980
Acquisition Source
Langley Research Center
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Jackson, Karen E.
(Army Research Lab. Hampton, VA, United States)
Fasanella, Edwin L.
(Army Research Lab. Hampton, VA, United States)
Lyle, Karen H.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Spellman, Regina L.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
November 1, 2004
Subject Category
Aircraft Design, Testing And Performance
Report/Patent Number
NASA/TM-2004-213501
ARL-TR-3337
L-19059
Report Number: NASA/TM-2004-213501
Report Number: ARL-TR-3337
Report Number: L-19059
Funding Number(s)
WORK_UNIT: WU 23-376-70-30-07
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available