NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Case Study of 'Engineering Peer Meetings' in JPL's ST-6 ProjectThis design process error-proofing case study describes a design review practice implemented by a project manager at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. There are many types of reviews at NASA: required and not, formalized and informal, programmatic and technical. Standing project formal reviews such as the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Critical Design Review (CDR) are a required part of every project and mission development. However, the engineering peer reviews that support teams technical work on such projects are often informal, ad hoc, and inconsistent across the organization. This case study discusses issues and innovations identified by a project manager at JPL and implemented in 'engineering peer meetings' for his group.
Document ID
20040201040
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Technical Memorandum (TM)
Authors
Chao, Lawrence P.
(Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA, United States)
Tumer, Irem
(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
October 19, 2004
Subject Category
Quality Assurance And Reliability
Report/Patent Number
NASA/TM-2004-212842
Report Number: NASA/TM-2004-212842
Funding Number(s)
OTHER: 303-10-22
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Work of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available