NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Case Studies of Fatigue Life Improvement Using Low Plasticity Burnishing in Gas Turbine Engine ApplicationsSurface enhancement technologies such as shot peening, laser shock peening (LSP), and low plasticity burnishing (LPB) can provide substantial fatigue life improvement. However, to be effective, the compressive residual stresses that increase fatigue strength must be retained in service. For successful integration into turbine design, the process must be affordable and compatible with the manufacturing environment. LPB provides thermally stable compression of comparable magnitude and even greater depth than other methods, and can be performed in conventional machine shop environments on CNC machine tools. LPB provides a means to extend the fatigue lives of both new and legacy aircraft engines and ground-based turbines. Improving fatigue performance by introducing deep stable layers of compressive residual stress avoids the generally cost prohibitive alternative of modifying either material or design. The X-ray diffraction based background studies of thermal and mechanical stability of surface enhancement techniques are briefly reviewed, demonstrating the importance of minimizing cold work. The LPB process, tooling, and control systems are described. An overview of current research programs conducted for engine OEMs and the military to apply LPB to a variety of engine and aging aircraft components are presented. Fatigue performance and residual stress data developed to date for several case studies are presented including: * The effect of LPB on the fatigue performance of the nickel based super alloy IN718, showing fatigue benefit of thermal stability at engine temperatures. * An order of magnitude improvement in damage tolerance of LPB processed Ti-6-4 fan blade leading edges. * Elimination of the fretting fatigue debit for Ti-6-4 with prior LPB. * Corrosion fatigue mitigation with LPB in Carpenter 450 steel. *Damage tolerance improvement in 17-4PH steel. Where appropriate, the performance of LPB is compared to conventional shot peening after exposure to engine operating temperatures.
Document ID
20050199660
Acquisition Source
Headquarters
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Prevey, Paul S.
(Lambda Research, Inc. Cincinnati, OH, United States)
Shepard, Michael
(Wright Lab. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, United States)
Ravindranath, Ravi A.
(Naval Air Station Patuxent River, MD, United States)
Gabb, Timothy
(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)
Date Acquired
September 7, 2013
Publication Date
January 1, 2003
Subject Category
Aircraft Propulsion And Power
Meeting Information
Meeting: ASME Turbo Expo 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Start Date: June 16, 2003
End Date: June 19, 2003
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available