NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Instrument Display Visual Angles for Conventional Aircraft and the MQ-9 Ground Control StationAircraft instrument panels should be designed such that primary displays are in optimal viewing location to minimize pilot perception and response time. Human Factors engineers define three zones (i.e. "cones") of visual location: 1) "Easy Eye Movement" (foveal vision); 2) "Maximum Eye Movement" (peripheral vision with saccades), and 3) "Head Movement" (head movement required). Instrument display visual angles were measured to determine how well conventional aircraft (T-34, T-38, F- 15B, F-16XL, F/A-18A, U-2D, ER-2, King Air, G-III, B-52H, DC-10, B747-SCA) and the MQ-9 ground control station (GCS) complied with these standards, and how they compared with each other. Methods: Selected instrument parameters included: attitude, pitch, bank, power, airspeed, altitude, vertical speed, heading, turn rate, slip/skid, AOA, flight path, latitude, longitude, course, bearing, range and time. Vertical and horizontal visual angles for each component were measured from the pilot s eye position in each system. Results: The vertical visual angles of displays in conventional aircraft lay within the cone of "Easy Eye Movement" for all but three of the parameters measured, and almost all of the horizontal visual angles fell within this range. All conventional vertical and horizontal visual angles lay within the cone of "Maximum Eye Movement". However, most instrument vertical visual angles of the MQ-9 GCS lay outside the cone of "Easy Eye Movement", though all were within the cone of "Maximum Eye Movement". All the horizontal visual angles for the MQ-9 GCS were within the cone of "Easy Eye Movement". Discussion: Most instrument displays in conventional aircraft lay within the cone of "Easy Eye Movement", though mission-critical instruments sometimes displaced less important instruments outside this area. Many of the MQ-9 GCS systems lay outside this area. Specific training for MQ-9 pilots may be needed to avoid increased response time and potential error during flight.
Document ID
20080022357
Acquisition Source
Armstrong Flight Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Bendrick, Gregg A.
(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)
Kamine, Tovy Haber
(Pennsylvania Univ. Medical Center Philadelphia, PA, United States)
Date Acquired
August 24, 2013
Publication Date
May 12, 2008
Subject Category
Avionics And Aircraft Instrumentation
Meeting Information
Meeting: Annual Scientific Meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association
Location: Boston, MA
Country: United States
Start Date: May 12, 2008
End Date: May 16, 2008
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available