NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Aerosol and Cloud Interaction Observed From High Spectral Resolution Lidar DataRecent studies utilizing satellite retrievals have shown a strong correlation between aerosol optical depth (AOD) and cloud cover. However, these retrievals from passive sensors are subject to many limitations, including cloud adjacency (or 3D) effects, possible cloud contamination, uncertainty in the AOD retrieval. Some of these limitations do not exist in High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) observations; for instance, HSRL observations are not a ected by cloud adjacency effects, are less prone to cloud contamination, and offer accurate aerosol property measurements (backscatter coefficient, extinction coefficient, lidar ratio, backscatter Angstrom exponent,and aerosol optical depth) at a neospatial resolution (less than 100 m) in the vicinity of clouds. Hence, the HSRL provides an important dataset for studying aerosol and cloud interaction. In this study, we statistically analyze aircraft-based HSRL profiles according to their distance from the nearest cloud, assuring that all profile comparisons are subject to the same large-scale meteorological conditions. Our results indicate that AODs from HSRL are about 17% higher in the proximity of clouds (approximately 100 m) than far away from clouds (4.5 km), which is much smaller than the reported cloud 3D effect on AOD retrievals. The backscatter and extinction coefficients also systematically increase in the vicinity of clouds, which can be explained by aerosol swelling in the high relative humidity (RH) environment and/or aerosol growth through in cloud processing (albeit not conclusively). On the other hand, we do not observe a systematic trend in lidar ratio; we hypothesize that this is caused by the opposite effects of aerosol swelling and aerosol in-cloud processing on the lidar ratio. Finally, the observed backscatter Angstrom exponent (BAE) does not show a consistent trend because of the complicated relationship between BAE and RH. We demonstrate that BAE should not be used as a surrogate for Angstrom exponent, especially at high RH.
Document ID
20090026563
Acquisition Source
Langley Research Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
External Source(s)
Authors
Su, Wenying
(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)
Schuster, Gregory L.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Loeb, Norman G.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Rogers, Raymond R.
(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)
Ferrare, Richard A.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Hostetler, Chris A.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Hair, Johnathan W.
(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)
Obland, Michael D.
(Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Inc. Washington, DC, United States)
Date Acquired
August 24, 2013
Publication Date
June 11, 2008
Publication Information
Publication: Journal of Geophysical Research
Volume: 113
Subject Category
Meteorology And Climatology
Report/Patent Number
LF99-7811
Report Number: LF99-7811
Funding Number(s)
WBS: WBS: 921266.04.07.07
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available