NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Drop Shapes Versus Fall Velocities in Rain: 2 Contrasting ExamplesRainfall retrievals from polarimetric radar measurements require the knowledge of four fundamental rain microstructure parameters, namely, drop size distribution, drop shape distribution, canting angles and drop fall velocities. Some recent measurements of all four parameters in natural rain are summarized in [1]. In this paper, we perform an in-depth analysis of two events, using two co-located 2D video disdrometers (2DVD; see [2]) both with high calibration accuracy, and a C-band polarimetric radar [3], located 15 km away. The two events, which occurred 7 days apart (on the 18th and the 25th of Dec 2009), had moderate-to-intense rainfall rates, but the second event had an embedded convection line within the storm. The line had passed over the 2DVD site, thus enabling the shapes and fall velocities to be determined as the line crossed the site. The first event was also captured in a similar manner by both the 2DVDs as well as the C-band radar. Drop fall velocity measurements for, say, the 3 mm drops show noticeable differences between the two events. Whereas for the first event, the velocity distribution showed a narrow and symmetric distribution, with a mode at the expected value (7.95 m/s, as given by the formula in [4]), the second event produced a wider distribution with a significant skewness towards lower velocities (although its mode too was close to the expected value). Moreover, the slower 3 mm drops in the second event occurred when the convection line was directly over the 2DVD site (03:35-03:45 utc), and not before nor after. A similar trend was observed in terms of the horizontal dimensions of the 3 mm drops, i.e. large fluctuations during the same time period, but not outside the period. Vertical dimensions of the drops also fluctuated but not to the same extent. Interestingly, the horizontal dimensions tended towards larger values during the 10-minute period, implying an increase in drop oblateness, which in turn indicates the possibility of the horizontal mode oscillation, one of the three fundamental modes of drop oscillations [5], albeit the most difficult one to excite.
Document ID
20120001443
Acquisition Source
Marshall Space Flight Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Thurai, M.
(Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, CO, United States)
Bringi, V. N.
(Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, CO, United States)
Petersen, W. A.
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)
Carey, L. D.
(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)
Gatlin, P. N.
(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)
Tokay, A.
(Maryland Univ. Baltimore, MD, United States)
Date Acquired
August 25, 2013
Publication Date
September 26, 2011
Subject Category
Meteorology And Climatology
Report/Patent Number
M11-0493
M11-0908
Report Number: M11-0493
Report Number: M11-0908
Meeting Information
Meeting: 35th Conference on Radar Meteorology
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Country: United States
Start Date: September 26, 2011
End Date: September 30, 2011
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF AGS-0924622
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available