NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Due to the lapse in federal government funding, NASA is not updating this website. We sincerely regret this inconvenience.

Back to Results
High Intensity Resistive and Rowing Exercise Countermeasures Do Not Prevent Orthostatic Intolerance Following 70 Days of Bed RestMore than 60% of US astronauts participating in Mir and early International Space Station missions (greater than 5 months) were unable to complete a 10‐min 80 deg head‐up tilt test on landing day. This high incidence of post‐spaceflight orthostatic intolerance may be related to limitations of the inflight exercise hardware that prevented high intensity training. PURPOSE: This study sought to determine if a countermeasure program that included intense lower‐body resistive and rowing exercises designed to prevent cardiovascular and musculoskeletal deconditioning during 70 days of 6 deg head-down tilt bed rest (BR), a spaceflight analog, also would protect against post‐ BR orthostatic intolerance. METHODS: Sixteen males participated in this study and performed no exercise (Control, n=10) or performed an intense supine exercise protocol with resistive and aerobic components (Exercise, n=6). On 3 days/week, exercise subjects performed lower body resistive exercise and a 30‐min continuous bout of rowing (greater than or equal to 75% max heart rate). On 3 other days/week, subjects performed only high‐intensity, interval‐style rowing. Orthostatic intolerance was assessed using a 15‐min 80 deg head‐up tilt test performed 2 days (BR‐2) before and on the last day of BR (BR70). Plasma volume was measured using a carbon monoxide rebreathing technique on BR‐3 and before rising on the first recovery day (BR+0). RESULTS: Following 70 days of BR, tilt tolerance time decreased significantly in both the Control (BR‐2: 15.0 +/- 0.0, BR70: 9.9 +/- 4.6 min, mean +/- SD) and Exercise (BR‐2: 12.2 +/- 4.7, BR70: 4.9 +/- 1.9 min) subjects, but the decreased tilt tolerance time was not different between groups (Control: ‐34 +/- 31, Exercise: ‐56 +/- 16%). Plasma volume also decreased (Control: ‐0.56 +/- 0.40, Exercise: ‐0.48 +/- 0.33 L) from pre to post‐BR, with no differences between groups (Control: ‐18 +/- 11%, Exerciser: ‐15 +/-1 0%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm previous reports in shorter BR studies that the performance of an exercise countermeasure protocol by itself during BR does not prevent orthostatic intolerance or plasma volume loss. This suggests that protection against orthostatic intolerance in astronauts following long‐duration spaceflight will require an additional intervention, such as periodic orthostatic stress, fluid repletion, and/or lower‐body compression garments.
Document ID
20140017003
Acquisition Source
Johnson Space Center
Document Type
Abstract
Authors
Lee, Stuart M. C.
(Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group Houston, TX, United States)
Stenger, Michael B.
(Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group Houston, TX, United States)
Laurie, Steven S.
(Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group Houston, TX, United States)
Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.
(Universities Space Research Association Houston, TX, United States)
Platts, Steven H.
(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)
Date Acquired
December 4, 2014
Publication Date
January 1, 2015
Subject Category
Aerospace Medicine
Report/Patent Number
JSC-CN-32335
Report Number: JSC-CN-32335
Meeting Information
Meeting: Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Start Date: May 26, 2015
End Date: May 30, 2015
Sponsors: American College of Sports Medicine
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
No Preview Available