NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Multi-Objective Hybrid Optimal Control for Multiple-Flyby Interplanetary Mission Design using Chemical PropulsionPreliminary design of high‐thrust interplanetary missions is a highly complex process. The mission designer must choose discrete parameters such as the number of flybys and the bodies at which those flybys are performed. For some missions, such as surveys of small bodies, the mission designer also contributes to target selection. In addition, real‐valued decision variables, such as launch epoch, flight times, maneuver and flyby epochs, and flyby altitudes must be chosen. There are often many thousands of possible trajectories to be evaluated. The customer who commissions a trajectory design is not usually interested in a point solution, but rather the exploration of the trade space of trajectories between several different objective functions. This can be a very expensive process in terms of the number of human analyst hours required. An automated approach is therefore very desirable. This work presents such an approach by posing the impulsive mission design problem as a multi‐objective hybrid optimal control problem. The method is demonstrated on several real‐world problems. Two assumptions are frequently made to simplify the modeling of an interplanetary high‐thrust trajectory during the preliminary design phase. The first assumption is that because the available thrust is high, any maneuvers performed by the spacecraft can be modeled as discrete changes in velocity. This assumption removes the need to integrate the equations of motion governing the motion of a spacecraft under thrust and allows the change in velocity to be modeled as an impulse and the expenditure of propellant to be modeled using the time‐independent solution to Tsiolkovsky's rocket equation [1]. The second assumption is that the spacecraft moves primarily under the influence of the central body, i.e. the sun, and all other perturbing forces may be neglected in preliminary design. The path of the spacecraft may then be modeled as a series of conic sections. When a spacecraft performs a close approach to a planet, the central body switches from the sun to that planet and the trajectory is modeled as a hyperbola with respect to the planet. This is known as the method of patched conics. The impulsive and patched‐conic assumptions significantly simplify the preliminary design problem.
Document ID
20150011450
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
Englander, Jacob A.
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)
Vavrina, Matthew A.
(AI Solutions, Inc. Colorado Springs, CO, United States)
Date Acquired
June 23, 2015
Publication Date
August 9, 2015
Subject Category
Aerodynamics
Spacecraft Propulsion And Power
Report/Patent Number
GSFC-E-DAA-TN21676
Report Number: GSFC-E-DAA-TN21676
Meeting Information
Meeting: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Meeting
Location: Vail, CO
Country: United States
Start Date: August 9, 2015
End Date: August 13, 2015
Sponsors: American Astronomical Society, American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNG14VC09C
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
Optimization
Trajactory
Design
No Preview Available