NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Collections About News Help Login

Press Enter or click the Search button to begin your search.

Back to Results
Nanoflare vs Footpoint Heating : Observational SignaturesTime lag analysis shows very long time lags between all channel pairs. Impulsive heating cannot address these long time lags. 3D Simulations of footpoint heating shows a similar pattern of time lags (magnitude and distribution) to observations. Time lags and relative peak intensities may be able to differentiate between TNE and impulsive heating solutions. Adding a high temperature channel (like XRT Be-­thin) may improve diagnostics.
Document ID
20150014587
Acquisition Source
Marshall Space Flight Center
Document Type
Presentation
Authors
Winebarger, Amy (NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)
Alexander, Caroline (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Huntsville, AL, United States)
Lionello, Roberto (Predictive Science, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)
Linker, Jon (Predictive Science, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)
Mikic, Zoran (Predictive Science, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)
Downs, Cooper (Predictive Science, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)
Date Acquired
July 31, 2015
Publication Date
July 21, 2015
Subject Category
Solar Physics
Report/Patent Number
MSFC-E-DAA-TN24966
Report Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN24966
Meeting Information
Meeting: Coronal Loop Workshop VII
Location: Cambridge
Country: United Kingdom
Start Date: July 21, 2015
End Date: July 23, 2015
Sponsors: Cambridge Univ.
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: NNH06CC03B
OTHER: 13314
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Public Use Permitted.
Keywords
corona simulation heating

Related Records

There are no records associated with this record.
No Preview Available