Cause and Cure - Deterioration in Accuracy of CFD Simulations with Use of High-Aspect-Ratio Triangular/Tetrahedral Grids

Traditionally high-aspect ratio triangular/tetrahedral meshes are avoided by CFD researchers in the vicinity of a solid wall, as it is known to reduce the accuracy of gradient computations in those regions. Although for certain complex geometries, the use of high-aspect ratio triangular/tetrahedral elements in the vicinity of a solid wall can be replaced by quadrilateral/prismatic elements, ability to use triangular/tetrahedral elements in such regions without any degradation in accuracy can be beneficial from a mesh generation point of view. The benefits also carry over to numerical frameworks such as the space-time conservation element and solution element (CESE), where simplex elements are the mandatory building blocks. With the requirement of the CESE method in mind, a rigorous mathematical framework that clearly identifies the reason behind the difficulties in use of such high-aspect ratio simplex elements is formulated using two different approaches and presented here. Drawing insights from the analysis, a potential solution to avoid that pitfall is also provided as part of this work. Furthermore, through the use of numerical simulations of practical viscous problems involving high-Reynolds number flows, how the gradient evaluation procedures of the CESE framework can be effectively used to produce accurate and stable results on such high-aspect ratio simplex meshes is also showcased.